Extracting Scenarios from a Bayesian Network as Explanations for Legal Evidence
نویسندگان
چکیده
In order to make an informed decision in a criminal trial, conclusions about what may have happened need to be derived from the available evidence. Recently, Bayesian networks have gained popularity as a probabilistic tool for reasoning with evidence. However, in order to make sense of a conclusion drawn from a Bayesian network, a juror needs to understand the context. In this paper, we propose to extract scenarios from a Bayesian network to form the context for the results of computations in that network. We interpret the narrative concepts of scenario schemes, local coherence and global coherence in terms of probabilities. These allow us to present an algorithm that takes the most probable configuration of variables of interest, computed from the Bayesian network, and forms a coherent scenario as a context for these variables. This way, we take advantage of the calculations in a Bayesian network, as well as the global perspective of narratives.
منابع مشابه
A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
Errors in reasoning about probabilistic evidence can have severe consequences. In the legal domain a number of recent miscarriages of justice emphasises how severe these consequences can be. These cases, in which forensic evidence was misinterpreted, have ignited a scientific debate on how and when probabilistic reasoning can be incorporated in (legal) argumentation. One promising approach is t...
متن کاملRepresenting and Evaluating Legal Narratives with Subscenarios in a Bayesian Network
In legal cases, stories or scenarios can serve as the context for a crime when reasoning with evidence. In order to develop a scientifically founded technique for evidential reasoning, a method is required for the representation and evaluation of various scenarios in a case. In this paper the probabilistic technique of Bayesian networks is proposed as a method for modeling narrative, and it is ...
متن کاملEvidential Reasoning for Forensic Readiness
To learn from the past, we analyse 1,088 “computer as a target” judgments for evidential reasoning by extracting four case elements: decision, intent, fact, and evidence. Analysing the decision element is essential for studying the scale of sentence severity for cross-jurisdictional comparisons. Examining the intent element can facilitate future risk assessment. Analysing the fact element can e...
متن کاملLogical Argumentation, Abduction and Bayesian Decision Theory: A Bayesian Approach to Logical Arguments and its Application to Legal Evidential Reasoning
There are good normative arguments for using Bayesian decision theory for deciding what to do. However, there are also good arguments for using logic, where we want have a formal semantics for a language and use the structure of logical argumentation with logical variables to represent multiple individuals (things). This paper shows how decision theory and logical argumentation can be combined ...
متن کاملComparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms with Optimization Purposes
The field of optimization and machine learning are increasingly interplayed and optimization in different problems leads to the use of machine learning approaches. Machine learning algorithms work in reasonable computational time for specific classes of problems and have important role in extracting knowledge from large amount of data. In this paper, a methodology has been employed to opt...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014